Max and all here send our heartfelt condolences to all involved. Sorry to just be seeing this post now or one would have responded in a more timely manner, Andy. Distracted. OXO ❤
He used to visit when my mother was alive but she shooed him away, not because she did not like cats, but because she was scared she might trip over him. After she died, every time I came to the house he would visit. By the time I moved in, he seemed to have already decided that this was where he wanted to be. I reopened the old cat flap so he could come and go as he pleased. Every time I came home from one of my adventures or from working in the city, he would be close by, waiting for my return with long stories and much purring.
View original post 582 more words
TORONTO’s eighth annual CAR FREE DAY was held 10 years ago today, on September 22, 2008.
This photo was shot on a stretch of Yonge Street devoid of motor vehicles — just south of the centre of the day’s festivities at Yonge/Dundas Square — by renowned Canadian photojournalist, Lucas Oleniuk, and appeared the following day in the TORONTO STAR.
At the time, I was running federally to represent Toronto’s west-end downtown riding of Davenport.
The intended Green Party of Canada candidate in our neighbourhood had pulled out of the race a couple weeks before the campaign was to begin, and the enviro-friendly fringe party had issued an online plea for a replacement.
Despite the understanding that we had no chance of winning the seat, I volunteered to run as part of keeping a personal promise to do “anything and everything ethical/legal” to deny then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party a majority government in Ottawa.
With then-veteran Green Party of Ontario leader, Frank de Jong as my campaign manager, we used my lifelong avowed aversion to unnecessary motor vehicle use*, along with the local name recognition one had garnered ten years earlier from a globally-reported, unanimous federal appeals court victory — which had forced an auto-addled mainstream bureaucracy to recognize foot and bicycle messengers as viable vehicles for the sustainable urban delivery of documents and small-load freight — to garner more than 10% of the vote in Davenport.
Much of that support was also tied to the high visibility GPC leader Elizabeth May attracted with her successful fight to be included in the nationally televised debates. Ms. May would lose her race in 2008, but would go on to become the first nationally elected Canadian Green Party member, in 2011.
I mention all of this a decade later to emphasize the irresponsible reversal in thinking on display, in what passes for Ontario today.
2,300,000 of our fellow citizens recently sold their souls — and their children’s future — for a promise of cheaper gas for their ever-larger motor vehicles.
With so many buying into the backward web of lies spun by Doug Ford and his oxymoronically named Progressive Conservative cult, they exposed a dark fount of deplorably selfish ignorance, that while apparently always having been there, now finds damaging release with the rise of so bellicose a populist champion.
We see the same phenomenon, but with even more risk of global peril, south of our border.
On the bright side, however, 3,400,000 Ontarians — a majority of whom reside within Ontario’s largest urban enclaves — voted against those who now hold our province hostage.
With recent related events surrounding the current manipulation of Toronto’s municipal election already focusing attention on the very real threat such poses to our nation’s democratic ideals, it is hoped that all engaged local citizens will work together to oust every municipal candidate with direct ties to wanna-be Despot Doug’s Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, from the 25-seat Toronto City Council.
Many of these incumbent hometown turncoats are easy to spot as they showed up at a Queen’s Park photo-op in vocal support of the ongoing provincial assault on our democratic rights. But it is their corrupt partisan activity on council — some over decades — that speaks even louder.
If we responsible Torontonians allow them to return to municipal positions of power, we afford yet another foothold from which the currently elected provincial tyrant might attack us where we choose to live, and work, and raise our families.
Please vote wisely dear TORONTO, 2018.
* Despite more than half-a-century of age eligibility, I have never even applied for a driver’s license, let alone added to Toronto’s pollution/congestion crises by driving a motor vehicle in our hometown.
At this point in my life, it doesn’t look like that almost 53-year non-driving vow will ever be broken.
And while one doesn’t expect anyone to match my zeal, I just put it out there to let folks know that it is indeed possible for every day to be CAR FREE DAY. OXO
On this date six years ago Special Prosecutor and experienced defence attorney, Richard Peck withdrew charges against former Attorney General Michael Bryant in the death of Darcy Allan Sheppard. Bryant was charged with criminal negligence causing death and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death. Bryant’s actions were captured on surveillance video and witnessed by several people, and subject to forensic evidence.
Over the past six years most people have forgotten the events of that night and the evidence surrounding those events. Here are 28 Forgotten Facts about the case:
1 One month before he killed Darcy Allan Sheppard in a road rage attack, Michael Bryant told the Toronto Star’s Jennifer Wells that “road rage is back in my life”
2 Michael Bryant admitted that the months leading up to the death of Darcy Allan Sheppard were a difficult time for him:“I was usually in the dog house that…
View original post 1,385 more words
Ever more questions, but still no answers.
What is it about Canada’s most controversial vehicular homicide, that the Liberal governments of first Dalton McGuinty, and now Kathleen Wynne, feel justified in keeping from, not only impacted Ontarians, but even more obscenely, the patiently stoic father of the dead man?
After the trial and acquittal of Jian Ghomeshi much has been written and spoken regarding his lawyer Marie Henein and her work with another famous client, former Ontario Attorney General, Michael Bryant. In both cases the media attributed Henein’s success to her ability to find exculpatory evidence supporting her clients. The question that has not been addressed is why did Ghomeshi’s case go to trial but not Bryant’s? Why did Henein reveal her entire defence to the Crown in Bryant’s case, in order to avoid a trial but not in Ghomeshi’s case?
The simple answer would be that Henein felt the evidence, against Jian Ghomeshi (including the exculpatory evidence she had uncovered) was stronger than the evidence against Michael Bryant. The Crown in Ghomeshi’s case went to trial because they believed they had a reasonable prospect of conviction. The Crown in Bryant’s case, represented by special prosecutor Richard Peck and his Ontario agent Mark Sandler determined that there was no reasonable prospect of…
View original post 1,778 more words